Excuse me, it's my first time with posting into thread like this. What does "law enforcement" have to do with pro mastering? Your statement "Saying things without references are also bad form so please stop making claims you don't know about." could also apply to you as I or no one else has any idea of who you are, what your experience is or any pertinent information that would lead us to conclude you know what you are talking about. I guess you want to remain a non entity and just take jabs at people. You are posting under a pseudonym and there is no information associated with your name. After a week he went from page 10 to page 1. There was a site that was going nowhere until the site owner had all his friends do multiple searches for his website. There is also a lot more on the The more you mention a site the more the site's ranking increases. if you got your song back in 10 min, then it cannot be analog processing involved (apart from the idea mastering IS NOT JUST PROCESSING)ĥ min song, just to print takes 5 min, download, upload, opening project and DOING SOME WORK WITH THE MUSIC - in this case few seconds left for deciding how to process your mix.Saying things without references are also bad form so please stop making claims you don't know about.Read this If 5$ difference between 10 min work of computer algorithm,Īnd 90 min of my work, as a mastering lad I am also positive I can deliver, as reviews and feedback from my clients tells me all I want to know Which is not automated, besides submitting your online order,Īnd I spend around 60-90 min working on your song, I will charge you 5$ more for my service, It would be cool to see what you all think. Perhaps later this week, I'll be able to post an example. It definitely outperformed Landr for what I was looking for. At the very least, I'm happy with having the option. Aria got my mix commercially loud while still keeping the dynamics in a way that I personally can't achieve on my own ITB. I just got hung up on the analog processing of it all. It was clear in Aria's description that there was never an actual person fixing anything. In a way this is even worse then landr, assuming landr at least makes some signal analysis, which I do not know.Ok, I see what you all are saying in regards to fixing versus signal processing. Fixing everything based on a loaded preset is, well, signal processing. Mastering is about hearing things before fixing them. This, in my opinion, has nothing to do with mastering. I get you, but what exactly did you want to hear? All we see from the website is a nice chain, that remains untouched and a computer is playing back your files and rerecording it automatically. Don't facepalm me until you've tried the service and can tell me what's audibly wrong with it. Even if they're lying and use an algorithm, it's a really good one. A 10-minute turnaround for an analog master seems unbelievable, but crazier things have been invented. I tried this Aria service to test their claims. I agree with everything said about automated mastering and obviously nothing beats me going to one of the dozens of professional mastering engineers in NYC. $35 hardly pays for my lunch so I figured, why not test Aria? I don't do it often, but I've spent thousands on mastering engineers in the past. Sometimes that requires a lot of money and sometimes it doesn't. I embrace technology and always use the best tool for the job. Everybody on this forum plays with overpriced toys. Like a robot is gonna be receiving a digital file and quickly shoving it into an analog mastering chain on one end, tweaking it for a few minutes and getting it right back out as a digital download the other Hey, don't knock Star Wars man. Something doesn't seem correct? Only people who play with StarWars toys would also play around with the idea that there can be 10 minute "automated" analog mastering using hardware.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |